<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does 10GigE + iSCSI = FC is in trouble???</title>
	<link>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2005/10/25/does-10gige-iscsi-fc-is-in-trouble/</link>
	<description>Storage Solutions for Real World IT Professionals</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Does 10GigE + iSCSI = FC is in trouble??? by: Errol Neal</title>
		<link>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2005/10/25/does-10gige-iscsi-fc-is-in-trouble/#comment-306</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2005/10/25/does-10gige-iscsi-fc-is-in-trouble/#comment-306</guid>
					<description>ISCSI offers great performance - but it requires much more tuning. Adjusting your TCP window size, tuning NIC parameters, configuring your network to support frames larger than the standard 1500 byte frame - these are all important when looking to configure ISCSI for performance. 
These techniques combined with the use of offload engines are sure to grant the implementor a successful deployment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>ISCSI offers great performance - but it requires much more tuning. Adjusting your TCP window size, tuning NIC parameters, configuring your network to support frames larger than the standard 1500 byte frame - these are all important when looking to configure ISCSI for performance.<br />
These techniques combined with the use of offload engines are sure to grant the implementor a successful deployment
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Does 10GigE + iSCSI = FC is in trouble??? by: pep</title>
		<link>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2005/10/25/does-10gige-iscsi-fc-is-in-trouble/#comment-135</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 10:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2005/10/25/does-10gige-iscsi-fc-is-in-trouble/#comment-135</guid>
					<description>this point of view is mainly focused on $$, obviously very important. 

but what about performace, is kwown that tcp/ip stack overload on servers is greater than fcp, this is negligible when you're transferring small amounts of data.

in case of high transfers (i.e. 500 MB/s), your server CPU will suffer and perhaps you'll need to increase the server CPU  power, adding cost to the solution. And this for every server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>this point of view is mainly focused on $$, obviously very important. </p>
	<p>but what about performace, is kwown that tcp/ip stack overload on servers is greater than fcp, this is negligible when you&#8217;re transferring small amounts of data.</p>
	<p>in case of high transfers (i.e. 500 MB/s), your server CPU will suffer and perhaps you&#8217;ll need to increase the server CPU  power, adding cost to the solution. And this for every server.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
