Has iSCSI changed the face of storage networking?
Posted in General, Storage Interconnects & RAID, Application Environments, Advisor - Joe Disher by Joe DisherStorage networking has long been a scary word for many IT pros. They talk about the fact that it’s too complex, too expensive, and it requires more planning and more management than they have time to deal with. But wait - is that for a Fibre Channel SAN or an iSCSI SAN? I contend that all of those arguments are true for FC, but not so much so for iSCSI.
Now that iSCSI is starting to get more widely accepted due to the low cost of Ethernet and the already embedded knowledge of IP Networking, will storage networking continue to have such a negative connotation for people? I would like to argue that iSCSI has forever changed the way storage networking will be perceived. The one side effect of iSCSI popularity that is not talked about as much is that traditional FC SANs have become easier to manage. Marketing terms like “Simple-SAN” and “SAN-in-a-can” are further proof that the FC proponents are at least trying to make the technology easier for customers. The reality is that they are getting easier. Easier then iSCSI? No - but easier.
So given the fact that iSCSI SANs are inherently less complex plus the evolving simplicity of FC SANs, I profess that, unequivocally, iSCSI has indeed changed the face of storage networking forever!
We could also talk about 10GbitE over copper as another driving force that will help to continually modify the perception of storage networks. Lower cost higher-speed networks never hurt!
Now, just to be fair – the whole storage networking world will get further disrupted by SAS as a storage networking protocol. By the end of 2006, customers will have more choices than they’ll know what to do with for their external storage connectivity.
I look forward to seeing how things work out.
Blog ya later!
Joe
July 3rd, 2007 at 1:44 am
The iSCSI technology is very promising and attractive. But for a Giga Ethernet Card(1Gb) the performance of iSCSI is about 80MB/s in LAN with software iSCSI such as UNH-iSCSI. One problem I want to know when there are two NIC cards in my storage. How to impove the overall performance. NIC cards using bonding technology does litter help to improve the performance. I think the bottleneck is in the iSCSI software implemention. Which the execution of the command are in order wether they arrived prior. Thank you!