<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the heck is “FC Base-T”?</title>
	<link>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2006/10/31/what-the-heck-is-%e2%80%9cfc-base-t%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Storage Solutions for Real World IT Professionals</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on What the heck is “FC Base-T”? by: Ernst Lopes Cardozo</title>
		<link>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2006/10/31/what-the-heck-is-%e2%80%9cfc-base-t%e2%80%9d/#comment-16412</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2006/10/31/what-the-heck-is-%e2%80%9cfc-base-t%e2%80%9d/#comment-16412</guid>
					<description>Addendum: See http://www.t11.org/t11/stat.nsf/1158203694fa939f852566dc0049e810/0442390ee2d213068525706500739f06?OpenDocument for the FC-BaseT project definition, status, business case, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Addendum: See <a href='http://www.t11.org/t11/stat.nsf/1158203694fa939f852566dc0049e810/0442390ee2d213068525706500739f06?OpenDocument' rel='nofollow'>http://www.t11.org/t11/stat.nsf/1158203694fa939f852566dc0049e810/0442390ee2d213068525706500739f06?OpenDocument</a> for the FC-BaseT project definition, status, business case, etc.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on What the heck is “FC Base-T”? by: Ernst Lopes Cardozo</title>
		<link>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2006/10/31/what-the-heck-is-%e2%80%9cfc-base-t%e2%80%9d/#comment-16406</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2006/10/31/what-the-heck-is-%e2%80%9cfc-base-t%e2%80%9d/#comment-16406</guid>
					<description>Tom, such comparisons depend on many factors, like the type of optical link (multi or single mode, distance) and whether the transceiver is a modular plug-in (a GBIC or SPF) or built-in. To get an idea, a 3Com 3C996B-T Gigabit Server NIC retails for 130 euro, its optical brother the 3C996-SX Gigabit short range fiber Server NIC costs 540 euro, 410 euro extra, so in this case at least the optical parts are far more expensive than the rest of the product. For a more expensive product like a HBA or FC switch, the relative difference would be less, but still significant. Of course, the FC market is minute in comparison with Ehernet's, so pricing will be less predictable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Tom, such comparisons depend on many factors, like the type of optical link (multi or single mode, distance) and whether the transceiver is a modular plug-in (a GBIC or SPF) or built-in. To get an idea, a 3Com 3C996B-T Gigabit Server NIC retails for 130 euro, its optical brother the 3C996-SX Gigabit short range fiber Server NIC costs 540 euro, 410 euro extra, so in this case at least the optical parts are far more expensive than the rest of the product. For a more expensive product like a HBA or FC switch, the relative difference would be less, but still significant. Of course, the FC market is minute in comparison with Ehernet&#8217;s, so pricing will be less predictable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on What the heck is “FC Base-T”? by: Tom</title>
		<link>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2006/10/31/what-the-heck-is-%e2%80%9cfc-base-t%e2%80%9d/#comment-16341</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2006/10/31/what-the-heck-is-%e2%80%9cfc-base-t%e2%80%9d/#comment-16341</guid>
					<description>Ernst, thanks for the clarification.  Do you know roughly how the price compares between FC-copper tranceivers and Base-T tranceivers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ernst, thanks for the clarification.  Do you know roughly how the price compares between FC-copper tranceivers and Base-T tranceivers?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on What the heck is “FC Base-T”? by: Ernst Lopes Cardozo</title>
		<link>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2006/10/31/what-the-heck-is-%e2%80%9cfc-base-t%e2%80%9d/#comment-16330</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://storageadvisors.adaptec.com/2006/10/31/what-the-heck-is-%e2%80%9cfc-base-t%e2%80%9d/#comment-16330</guid>
					<description>The Base-x notation in Ethernet is used to describe various physical layers, with T or TX used for twisted pair cable. So FC-Base-T would be a logical name for FC using a copper cable rather than an optical cable. Now FC was defined with an electrical variant all along, but that worked only at lower bit rates. Now that darn cheap 1G and soon 10G &quot;Base-T&quot; transceivers are are available, it makes sense to build FC switches and HBA's that use these to lower the port cost. If you can't beat 'em, join them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The Base-x notation in Ethernet is used to describe various physical layers, with T or TX used for twisted pair cable. So FC-Base-T would be a logical name for FC using a copper cable rather than an optical cable. Now FC was defined with an electrical variant all along, but that worked only at lower bit rates. Now that darn cheap 1G and soon 10G &#8220;Base-T&#8221; transceivers are are available, it makes sense to build FC switches and HBA&#8217;s that use these to lower the port cost. If you can&#8217;t beat &#8216;em, join them!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
